07 TaG weights

Home Forums General Discussion 07 TaG weights

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 59 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #55894
    David Watkins
    Participant

    Thanks for the update Blink. So that means that the SA250 with the old exhaust will remain at 200 lbs for Tag Masters right?

    #55895
    swhannum
    Participant

    Normally I wouldn?t even think of writing a post in regard to any TAG class. Primarily because I wouldn?t have a clue what I was talking about, (obviously this principal has not been adopted by everyone in regard to the other classes). However, in this case I feel that over the past three years I and we, in Colorado have been enlightened about the natural future of Karting, (even if the rest of the country is in the dark) and, that the answer to that future is obvious including the TAG class. What seems surprising is that proponents of this solution, (already implemented in other classes) have not already applied it to the TAG class. Particularly with the constant discussion of varying motor packages and endless weight jockeying. The very same advantages and benefits enjoyed by other classes could now benefit the TAG class. So here?s the obvious choice: 1. It?s a four stroke (?the wave of the future? anyway). 2. It has 24 reliable hp. 3. It has 12 volt electric start. 4. It has a wide power range so it will simplify gearing for the newbie?s. 5. Its EPA friendly. 6. You can buy one (or more), get parts and service at dealers world wide. 7. It measures 16?x18.5?x18?. 8. It only weighs 94.8 lbs. 9. And the very best thing is that you can buy them all day long (and will probably have to) for under $1,300. 10. Its even manufactured by one of the largest most respected engine manufacturers in the world and has a long history of reliability. I?m telling you, this is the answer to all of our TAG issues. Only one engine, you could even seal them making tech easy, one weight so no problems at the scales. True, you couldn?t race it anywhere else in the country but we all know that so few of us actually travel anyway that we can?t really consider that as an issue. Just because the rest of the country has a relatively consistent and successful TAG program doesn?t mean that Colorado can?t pioneer a new direction, go off on its own exclusive path! The answer has been right in front of us the whole time?.the Honda GX 670! The key here is to be ahead of the curve. Don?t wait until you have to have one, get one now. Be prepared. Reconfigure your chassis tubing ahead of time making for an easy transition. Driving tip: Practice every so often with your seat half way over the left frame rail so that you will be used to that. I?ve heard that an elliptical steering wheel works well with this package and that an elevator shoe worn on the right foot makes it feel almost like normal when trying to reach the throttle pedal. Some may have trouble getting used to that while walking around in the pits but I guess we could dig a narrow trench around the pits and designate a set direction for foot traffic. That would all have to be worth it, wouldn?t it?

    Scott Hannum

    #55896
    Brad Linkus
    Participant

    Scott, it is obvious your sarcastic comments are aimed at me, a visionary who regularly thinks out of the box. I find that interesting coming from the same person who is making kart wheels out of nylon when everyone else uses aluminum or magnesium. Or the same person who builds his own bodywork when everyone else in the world is using CIK approved bodywork that has been tested and proven safe. / http://www.kartiqueracing.com /. You should win the award for the most flagrant hypocrite of the year. Are you the only one allowed to experiment with the status quo?

    #55897
    Jim Keesling
    Participant

    Kirk,
    To answer the orginal question,
    TaG USA archives the weights for the packages that still run, but maybe not in great numbers.
    You still can run with the CSC, just check out the archived section of TaG USA.
    Hope this helps.
    Jim

    #55898
    swhannum
    Participant

    Actually it was not aimed at you, sorry.

    But thanks for all the advertising!

    Scott

    #55899
    Brad Linkus
    Participant

    Scott,

    Why can’t you just say what?s on your mind instead of creating your own soap opera. If you have a problem with me and the Honda engine, which is obvious from your previous post, spend your time telling everyone what you think is wrong with them and my concept of a controlled engine package. You can also explain what you think is so right about the Comer engines. What do you think the Comer was used for before it was used on a kart? It was a weed eater engine, or a leaf blower engine, or what ever it could be used for. The Comers were not designed exclusively for kart racing. All I am trying to do is offer an engine package that will grow the sport at the entry level. Cherry picking parts to build an engine for an entry level class will never accomplish my goal of growing the sport. There needs to be more control of the engines for the entry level classes so that parents can concentrate on driving and chassis set up instead of how to buy a win with a special high dollar engine from Mr. May. If your post was not about me then who was it aimed at?

    #55900
    Kirk Deason
    Participant

    Jim,

    Thank you for the rules clarification. I’m looking forward to some warm weather to start practising. However, skiing in 10 inches of powder at Copper on Friday has helped with that ‘fast’ feeling that I’ve been missing. Mmmmmmmmm powwwwderrrr. *Homer Simpson voice*

    Kirk

    #55901
    George Durdin
    Participant

    Blink,
    As a self appointed visionary that thinks outside of the box you really should do your due diligence before sticking your foot in your mouth, especially in this age of information technology. Absolutely everyone, including Honda will agree that their engines are made for general purpose use. Your assertion that Comer engines are just weedeater and general purpose engines, of poor quality is untrue and unfounded.

    I would suggest that if anyone out there wants to know more about Comer KART racing engines that you visit http://www.comer-topkart.it and get the information from the horses mouth instead of the other end.

    Comer-Topkart is located in Bagnola, Italy and has been involved in the production of kart racing engines and chassis’ since 1990. You can also visit http://www.zipkart.com in the UK were the they build and SEAL the W60 for MSA competition. Apparently there are other visionaries that think outside of the box who have beaten you to the punch….and they have done it internationally.

    A boxstock Comer K 80 junior kart racing engine, including a factory clutch can be purchased and sealed for approximately $815.00. The Comer rod is good for better than 60 hours with recommended top ends at 15 to 20 hour intervals…..that is four top ends before replacing the crank and rod. Many of them are very competitive well beyond recommended service intervals.

    The Honda GX200 engine, that you are purchasing for $360.00 to 380.00 wholesale and then propose to modify for a Junior class is WAY too much engine to give an 8 to 9 year old entry level racer. These are the same engines that you are using for your rental fleet to push adults around your track at 45 to 55 miles an hour……..have you considered how fast they are going to be on a cadet chassis at 230 lbs.?

    #55902
    Brad Linkus
    Participant

    George,

    Everyone knows all about the Comer engines and the disparity between them, why do you think people spend thousands of dollars for a fast engine?
    How fast do you think one of those high dollar beloved Comer 80 engines run? The Honda’s will be running the same lap times as the slow sealed Comers so what is your problem? We are using a spec gear at each track to control the top speed. The Honda’s won’t be as fast as the 12hp Animals they were using for the last few years by a long shot. You should be more worried about your own changes to the WKA rules you have modified than what we are doing. I don’t see a sealed Comer class or a vevey pipe in WKA.

    #55903
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Don’t worry Scott, I’m sure I’m not the only one who got the humor of your post. But, dude, poking wild animals with sticks is a bad idea….fun, but bad.

    Now that the arguing has started again, I think I may go back into that dark room, the voices in my head are less annoying! :loony:

    Drew

    #55904
    Tom Dennin
    Participant

    So anyone take a look at the TAGUSA rules lately?

    The Rotax is back to the same weight as in 2006.

    The Biland is at 370lbs TAG Sr. & 400 lbs TAG Master. So now they have actually reduced the weight from 2006?? Also, this weight is for both the old and new exhaust??

    From the TAGUSA rules:

    Biland SA250, Sidewinder and Stealth – See Engine Approval Sheet in Section 1.0. The current engines, Sidewinder and Stealth will now be fitted with the same exhaust system. This is due to manufacturing problems and the issue of noise. The old style exhaust will still be legal to use, only at tracks within organizations that noise is not an issue. Intake manifold – 30mm, 40mm and 50mm approved only.

    They have also designated the 9.5cc for sprint only???

    From the TAGUSA rules:

    P. Motori Seven
    CCV – 9.5cc Sprint Only
    CCV – 12.0cc Road Race
    Minimum squish – 0.028 Sprint Only
    Minimum squish – 0.035 Road Race
    Carburetor – NHSH 30 CS (max dia. 30.06mm)
    Venturi – 1.185
    Carburetor bore – 1.19
    Exhaust height – See Section 1.0 as per PDF
    Ignition – Digital
    Exhaust SR & Master – Stamped w/Muffler
    Reed thickness
    Junior Engine utilizes different cylinder ? See PDF

    Is this the final version of the rules for 2007?

    #55905
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Tom,

    I understand it is a living document but, if the Csc is going to accept where Tag Usa is now (or at a predetermined point) and not make changes throughout the season (as we did with Tag Usa’s weight change to the Sonik mid season, which I agreed with) we could make decisions for next year.

    Is the Csc rolling with the changes as they come or are we going to firm things up as before and keep it the same for the season?

    Scott, what is this new Tag motor of which you speak? We are very interested!!!

    And Tom, Maybe running a Shifter or Rotax is not a bad route. You have one of everything anyway. Don’t you? Ah, except the improved performance reduced weight package! Lol

    Rick

    #55906
    Les Prins
    Participant

    Did anyone answer Kirk’s question in the first post about the Easykart not in the list of weights for 2007?

    #55907
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Yes Les,

    Jim responded to his question on page 2 of this thread. If your drivers are considering running an engine that is not current in the listings, see below as well.

    Jim Keesling
    PostPosted: Fri 01 5, 2007 11:39 am Post subject: Reply with quote
    Kirk,
    To answer the orginal question,
    TaG USA archives the weights for the packages that still run, but maybe not in great numbers.
    You still can run with the CSC, just check out the archived section of TaG USA.
    Hope this helps.
    Jim

    Rick

    #55908
    Tom Dennin
    Participant

    Here is the thing, to believe that TAGUSA just made a mistake in the first version of the 2007 minimum weights is naive. The editor didn’t by chance go in and change a couple things here and a couple of things there. Now, without any “more real data”, they decide to lower the weight for both old and new exhaust Biland’s. If they had hard data the weights would not be the same for old and new exhaust motors.

    It can only be interpreted that they, TAGUSA, have no idea what they are doing. Meaning that the new and old exhaust make a completely different beast when it comes to the Biland. I interpreted this as they reacted to the Supernational and added weight incorrectly. Then many people complained and they made a sweeping change based on word of mouth and lowered the weight???

    Also, I remember the weight being changed on the Sonik during the season after the first race in Grand Junction in 2005. So to say that won’t or has not happened is false.

    I myself am going to be running Rotax’s all year ( Rotax Challenge and CSC TAG Masters). The shifter is just for fun.

    And Rick, it is nice to have one of everything, as you put it, that way I decide rather than having a decision made for me :cheers:

    Oh yeah what about the head for the Motori does no one seem to mind that this should give a competitive edge at least up here at our altitude??

    One more thing, isn’t it interesting how the Leopard seems to just quietly get by being the equal if not better at all tracks. :idn:

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 59 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.