Home › Forums › General Discussion › ? TEARDOWN OF SEALED ROTAX MOTORS BY TECH DIRECTOR? › Reply To: ? TEARDOWN OF SEALED ROTAX MOTORS BY TECH DIRECTOR?
I was told today that the engine in question was not torn down and there is not a protest in the works. Quit your whinning. My point is if you choose to run a sealed engine in a class that does not require seals then you take the risk of the tech director wanting to open it up since we are using SKUSA rules. If the Rotax has such an advantage over all the other engines in the class at IMI and GJMS then the weights should be set different for each track to make it fair. I will tell all of you that the weights for all the TAG classes for the IMI series will be adjusted for this disparity before the next race. I agree with Doug that if everything stays the same it will be a two engine class and you can see that by the type of engines that have quit running the CSC series. I would welcome any comments as to how the weights should be set for each engine at IMI to even the field. The way it is right now the Leopards have the advantage in TAG Junior and the Rotax has the advantage in the senior and masters class, this is obvious. So what should we do about it?